December 7, 2009
IN THE UNITED STATES
CIVIL MATTER
Southern Puff Smokes
Plaintiff
vs.
Lenny Oscow
Defendant
Mr. Oscow's Claim
Stoned Tobacco under Tumor Brands was taken off of the market because of it's toxic and carcinogenous nature. Because of the amount of hazardous toxins, which were contained in Stoned Tobacco, as they was known for being super strong and potent; Mr. Oscow's altered rendition was to bring attention to the damage that still persists even fourty years after the brand was last sold. Stoned Tobacco was very popular and it was proven that it's use affected the health of Stoned Tobacco's customers years later.
Conclusion
Stoned Tobacco ad's were no longer copyright protected at the time of Mr. Oscow's use of the ad either in part or whole. Mr. Oscow did nothing by way of his "version" of dated product to encourage or entice people into harm by associating Stoned Tobacco with any brand currently owned under Southern Puff Smokes. Mr. Oscow also did not mention Southern Puff Smokes directly in a negative aspect. Southern puff's claim was in attempt to collect revenues from a defunct brand for which Southern Puff Smokes no longer has legal claim to. Southern Puff Smokes created attention to itself and any damage as a result by continuing to associate itself with a brand such as Stoned Tobacco known for its long term damage to it's former consumers.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, that this court has ruled in favor of Mr. Lenny Oscow with regard to his use of image available to the public which was not owned or copyrighted by Southern Puff Smokes.
Dated: December 6, 2009 A. Sadiq
On Behalf of Pieces
Posted by Sheri Harris. Posted In : Memorandum-09
November 30, 2009
IN THE UNITED STATES CIVIL MATTER Southern Puff Smokes Plaintiff vs. Lenny Oscow Defendant Preliminary Statement Mr. Lenny Oscow downloaded a picture off the internet. These pictures were from a gallery of sorts entailing that of defunct advertisements. The product by which Mr. Oscow used in picture is now a defunct and the brand is no longer sold or used by consumer. Mr. Oscow used the picture for artistic impression of his own and created another image with the use of this picture. Once the item wa... Continue reading...
Posted by Sheri Harris.
November 23, 2009
IN THE UNITED STATES CIVIL MATTER Jupiter Devon and Dare Lichmon touched each other in front of a crowd of several people watching. A person in attendance is now suing for damages resulting from the place being overcrowded. Pieces: So there was some ass-igned seating involved? Plaintiff: Exactly, they clearly picked a bone with this one! Pieces: Well, things have to be orderly so everyone could see it all take place. What was the problem? Plaintiff: Things became heated, you know the vibe and inten... Continue reading...
Posted by Sheri Harris. Posted In : Orders-09
November 16, 2009
IN THE UNITED STATES CIVIL MATTER Connie Barton filed complaint with Pieces after a dispute with the owner of a franchise that processed goods Ms. Barton now refuses to pay for. Pieces: So these people were real bad newsers. Ms. Barton: Their machinery was unsafe. Pieces: What type of wok was done? Ms. Barton: I did the usual screening for abnormalities. Pieces: So that type of work must make you proud given that so many people depend on it? Ms. Barton: I always did my share of investigation before ... Continue reading...
Posted by Sheri Harris. Posted In : Orders-09
November 9, 2009
SECOND ARGUMENT
Mr. Tall struck the assailant Mr. Nez in the chest with a taser.This caused Mr. Nez to evenutally suffer cardiac arrest symptoms. Although the instrument is considered of "non-deadly force", the instrument was used on Mr. Nez's body in a place where death could have resulted. After these findings the officer charged Mr. Tall with aggravated battery and assault.
FINDINGS
Ms. Vain and Mr. Tall were beaten before they were robbed. The couple sustained serious but not life threatenin... Continue reading...
Posted by Sheri Harris. Posted In : Rulings-09
November 2, 2009
IN THE UNITED STATES CIVIL MATTER SYNOPSIS Millie Vain and Jeremy Tall were accosted by a man who beat and robbed both Ms. Vain and Mr. Tall one evening as they were walking home. The couple who were severly attacked managed to phone police for help. They were taken to a nearby hospital suffering from bruises,torso and broken rib injuries over the face and body. A short time later the assailant who fit the description of a man who robbed the couple was admitted to the hospital with chest and gro... Continue reading...
Posted by Sheri Harris.
October 25, 2009
With regard to Ms. Wells medical tests it was concured that all was normal as Ms. Well did not have any illness or disorder that would require furthur hositalization or out patient treatment. When asked if she was given any other exam outside of the norm that would indicate telepathy awareness or paranormal ability Ms. Wells shrugged and said no. As that sort of test would be an irregular approach but was necessary to ask in that Ms. Wells stated that there were complaints of her being consid... Continue reading...
Posted by Sheri Harris. Posted In : Rulings-09
October 19, 2009
SYNOPSIS This court was asked to rule with regards to Ms. Buffy Wells as supported by Amicus Briefs that were filed in support of Ms. Wells. Those briefs contained information suggesting that the patient was wrongfully detained in a mental facility steming from a complaint that was placed with a local police department. It seems that Ms. Wells was outside walking and in "conversation" with herself when a patrol car saw her and ultimately took Ms. Wells to a mental facility for evaluation. It... Continue reading...
Posted by Sheri Harris. Posted In : Case of Buffy Wells
October 12, 2009
IN THE UNITED STATES CIVIL MATTER Plaintiff v. Defendant Raul Pennant and Jenny Butters are in a dispute over a sign that Jenny felt Mr. Pennant should have noticed. Because of his negligence Jenny Butters is upset and has now taken her complaint to Pieces. Pieces: It was over your head, as I take it? Mr. Pennant: No! She got in over hers. Pieces: Please explain. Mr. Pennant: I was goin along smoothly and then suddenly I was interrupted by this sign to halt. Pieces: Well why didn't you obey? Mr. Pennant... Continue reading...
Posted by Sheri Harris. Posted In : Orders-09
October 5, 2009
IN THE UNITED STATES CIVIL MATTER Plaintiff v. Defendant Bing Travers and Stella Tribe complained to Pieces after they were charged because of a profit from their stock. Pieces: This was somewhat of a setback for you? Ms. Tribe: We were so happy with the addition! Pieces: If you were so happy, why are you here? Mr. Travers: Because they didn't want to make good on payment, they only wanted to give us partial reimbursement. Pieces: Well there are brokers fees involved which is why they wanted so much mo... Continue reading...
Posted by Sheri Harris. Posted In : Orders-09
December 7, 2009
IN THE UNITED STATES
CIVIL MATTER
Southern Puff Smokes
Plaintiff
vs.
Lenny Oscow
Defendant
Mr. Oscow's Claim
Stoned Tobacco under Tumor Brands was taken off of the market because of it's toxic and carcinogenous nature. Because of the amount of hazardous toxins, which were contained in Stoned Tobacco, as they was known for being super strong and potent; Mr. Oscow's altered rendition was to bring attention to the damage that still persists even fourty years after the brand was last sold. Stoned Tobacco was very popular and it was proven that it's use affected the health of Stoned Tobacco's customers years later.
Conclusion
Stoned Tobacco ad's were no longer copyright protected at the time of Mr. Oscow's use of the ad either in part or whole. Mr. Oscow did nothing by way of his "version" of dated product to encourage or entice people into harm by associating Stoned Tobacco with any brand currently owned under Southern Puff Smokes. Mr. Oscow also did not mention Southern Puff Smokes directly in a negative aspect. Southern puff's claim was in attempt to collect revenues from a defunct brand for which Southern Puff Smokes no longer has legal claim to. Southern Puff Smokes created attention to itself and any damage as a result by continuing to associate itself with a brand such as Stoned Tobacco known for its long term damage to it's former consumers.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, that this court has ruled in favor of Mr. Lenny Oscow with regard to his use of image available to the public which was not owned or copyrighted by Southern Puff Smokes.
Dated: December 6, 2009 A. Sadiq
On Behalf of Pieces
Posted by Sheri Harris. Posted In : Memorandum-09
November 30, 2009
IN THE UNITED STATES CIVIL MATTER Southern Puff Smokes Plaintiff vs. Lenny Oscow Defendant Preliminary Statement Mr. Lenny Oscow downloaded a picture off the internet. These pictures were from a gallery of sorts entailing that of defunct advertisements. The product by which Mr. Oscow used in picture is now a defunct and the brand is no longer sold or used by consumer. Mr. Oscow used the picture for artistic impression of his own and created another image with the use of this picture. Once the item wa... Continue reading...
Posted by Sheri Harris.
November 23, 2009
IN THE UNITED STATES CIVIL MATTER Jupiter Devon and Dare Lichmon touched each other in front of a crowd of several people watching. A person in attendance is now suing for damages resulting from the place being overcrowded. Pieces: So there was some ass-igned seating involved? Plaintiff: Exactly, they clearly picked a bone with this one! Pieces: Well, things have to be orderly so everyone could see it all take place. What was the problem? Plaintiff: Things became heated, you know the vibe and inten... Continue reading...
Posted by Sheri Harris. Posted In : Orders-09
November 16, 2009
IN THE UNITED STATES CIVIL MATTER Connie Barton filed complaint with Pieces after a dispute with the owner of a franchise that processed goods Ms. Barton now refuses to pay for. Pieces: So these people were real bad newsers. Ms. Barton: Their machinery was unsafe. Pieces: What type of wok was done? Ms. Barton: I did the usual screening for abnormalities. Pieces: So that type of work must make you proud given that so many people depend on it? Ms. Barton: I always did my share of investigation before ... Continue reading...
Posted by Sheri Harris. Posted In : Orders-09
November 9, 2009
SECOND ARGUMENT
Mr. Tall struck the assailant Mr. Nez in the chest with a taser.This caused Mr. Nez to evenutally suffer cardiac arrest symptoms. Although the instrument is considered of "non-deadly force", the instrument was used on Mr. Nez's body in a place where death could have resulted. After these findings the officer charged Mr. Tall with aggravated battery and assault.
FINDINGS
Ms. Vain and Mr. Tall were beaten before they were robbed. The couple sustained serious but not life threatenin... Continue reading...
Posted by Sheri Harris. Posted In : Rulings-09
November 2, 2009
IN THE UNITED STATES CIVIL MATTER SYNOPSIS Millie Vain and Jeremy Tall were accosted by a man who beat and robbed both Ms. Vain and Mr. Tall one evening as they were walking home. The couple who were severly attacked managed to phone police for help. They were taken to a nearby hospital suffering from bruises,torso and broken rib injuries over the face and body. A short time later the assailant who fit the description of a man who robbed the couple was admitted to the hospital with chest and gro... Continue reading...
Posted by Sheri Harris.
October 25, 2009
With regard to Ms. Wells medical tests it was concured that all was normal as Ms. Well did not have any illness or disorder that would require furthur hositalization or out patient treatment. When asked if she was given any other exam outside of the norm that would indicate telepathy awareness or paranormal ability Ms. Wells shrugged and said no. As that sort of test would be an irregular approach but was necessary to ask in that Ms. Wells stated that there were complaints of her being consid... Continue reading...
Posted by Sheri Harris. Posted In : Rulings-09
October 19, 2009
SYNOPSIS This court was asked to rule with regards to Ms. Buffy Wells as supported by Amicus Briefs that were filed in support of Ms. Wells. Those briefs contained information suggesting that the patient was wrongfully detained in a mental facility steming from a complaint that was placed with a local police department. It seems that Ms. Wells was outside walking and in "conversation" with herself when a patrol car saw her and ultimately took Ms. Wells to a mental facility for evaluation. It... Continue reading...
Posted by Sheri Harris. Posted In : Case of Buffy Wells
October 12, 2009
IN THE UNITED STATES CIVIL MATTER Plaintiff v. Defendant Raul Pennant and Jenny Butters are in a dispute over a sign that Jenny felt Mr. Pennant should have noticed. Because of his negligence Jenny Butters is upset and has now taken her complaint to Pieces. Pieces: It was over your head, as I take it? Mr. Pennant: No! She got in over hers. Pieces: Please explain. Mr. Pennant: I was goin along smoothly and then suddenly I was interrupted by this sign to halt. Pieces: Well why didn't you obey? Mr. Pennant... Continue reading...
Posted by Sheri Harris. Posted In : Orders-09
October 5, 2009
IN THE UNITED STATES CIVIL MATTER Plaintiff v. Defendant Bing Travers and Stella Tribe complained to Pieces after they were charged because of a profit from their stock. Pieces: This was somewhat of a setback for you? Ms. Tribe: We were so happy with the addition! Pieces: If you were so happy, why are you here? Mr. Travers: Because they didn't want to make good on payment, they only wanted to give us partial reimbursement. Pieces: Well there are brokers fees involved which is why they wanted so much mo... Continue reading...
Posted by Sheri Harris. Posted In : Orders-09
| |