Angel by Design?

Posted by Sheri Harris on Saturday, May 2, 2009 Under: LAW
What are the forces behind many who believe by extreme?  People in varied culture unite and attempt to gather as citizens of all. When the "pharmaceutical" is in demand and no cure becomes of immediate supply; the world loses all composition of reinforcement. Therefore, how do we tolerate, survive and live beyond a destined sentence that will affect us all?

Should we ask, is the martyr born of a person or thrust upon to aid in sacrifice resulting from lack of pharmaceutical cure? To "immolate" would be to sacrifice in that there would be no solvent of an answer to an otherwise predictable situation as in death. This can be used as a reason as to why there are those that resort to such infliction because of disparate treatment one will endure before and after demise of persons seeking a cure in ill measure of approach.

It is often the sheep in off color, that is used to fend for self as the others are herded in guidance. This existence in life towards a sect of people results in a martyred trait among person. The interest of money and all it can buy is there, but highly irrelevant to the role in martyr because they are of sacrifice.  In that way of living any and such expense would not be considered sacrificial, and therefore of no pharmaceutical abide.

To make a practice of "immolation" illegal, any governed entity must review their own statutes with regard to verdict determination; as such a decision inadvertently leads to the martyred being of an individual. If a system chooses in myriad of extreme to allow consequences of the "being" to exist, then it is that system which allows the damaged and destruction to the martyr.  If the "cured" or "survivor" of being in martyr  in an "action" of incident has humanly replicated a "being"afterwards of persecution; such an instance can be feared in that now that individual as a survivor and belief now questions the authority and power it has given to those in pursuit of martyr for pharmaceutical and obide of statute.

To what extreme of belief in proportion must a person endure replication of person in persecution until any legal or biblical statute considers it unethical and most of all unnatural for persons to continue this way?

Such control by legal remedy must reprimand those directly who involve in the unlawful than to seek its martyr for sacrifical demand. And, if pharmaceutical curse; a remedy in cure has yet to be established people may have to forego actions that result in illness.

In : LAW 



null

About Me


The writer professes a desire for human existence to evolve itself. If in effect change cannot withstand such struggles of forefather implementation; then it will be that of America who will exist without furthur progress. Sadiq's General e-mail: gdi104@aol.com

Angel by Design?

Posted by Sheri Harris on Saturday, May 2, 2009 Under: LAW
What are the forces behind many who believe by extreme?  People in varied culture unite and attempt to gather as citizens of all. When the "pharmaceutical" is in demand and no cure becomes of immediate supply; the world loses all composition of reinforcement. Therefore, how do we tolerate, survive and live beyond a destined sentence that will affect us all?

Should we ask, is the martyr born of a person or thrust upon to aid in sacrifice resulting from lack of pharmaceutical cure? To "immolate" would be to sacrifice in that there would be no solvent of an answer to an otherwise predictable situation as in death. This can be used as a reason as to why there are those that resort to such infliction because of disparate treatment one will endure before and after demise of persons seeking a cure in ill measure of approach.

It is often the sheep in off color, that is used to fend for self as the others are herded in guidance. This existence in life towards a sect of people results in a martyred trait among person. The interest of money and all it can buy is there, but highly irrelevant to the role in martyr because they are of sacrifice.  In that way of living any and such expense would not be considered sacrificial, and therefore of no pharmaceutical abide.

To make a practice of "immolation" illegal, any governed entity must review their own statutes with regard to verdict determination; as such a decision inadvertently leads to the martyred being of an individual. If a system chooses in myriad of extreme to allow consequences of the "being" to exist, then it is that system which allows the damaged and destruction to the martyr.  If the "cured" or "survivor" of being in martyr  in an "action" of incident has humanly replicated a "being"afterwards of persecution; such an instance can be feared in that now that individual as a survivor and belief now questions the authority and power it has given to those in pursuit of martyr for pharmaceutical and obide of statute.

To what extreme of belief in proportion must a person endure replication of person in persecution until any legal or biblical statute considers it unethical and most of all unnatural for persons to continue this way?

Such control by legal remedy must reprimand those directly who involve in the unlawful than to seek its martyr for sacrifical demand. And, if pharmaceutical curse; a remedy in cure has yet to be established people may have to forego actions that result in illness.

In : LAW 



null

Angel by Design?

Posted by Sheri Harris on Saturday, May 2, 2009 Under: LAW
What are the forces behind many who believe by extreme?  People in varied culture unite and attempt to gather as citizens of all. When the "pharmaceutical" is in demand and no cure becomes of immediate supply; the world loses all composition of reinforcement. Therefore, how do we tolerate, survive and live beyond a destined sentence that will affect us all?

Should we ask, is the martyr born of a person or thrust upon to aid in sacrifice resulting from lack of pharmaceutical cure? To "immolate" would be to sacrifice in that there would be no solvent of an answer to an otherwise predictable situation as in death. This can be used as a reason as to why there are those that resort to such infliction because of disparate treatment one will endure before and after demise of persons seeking a cure in ill measure of approach.

It is often the sheep in off color, that is used to fend for self as the others are herded in guidance. This existence in life towards a sect of people results in a martyred trait among person. The interest of money and all it can buy is there, but highly irrelevant to the role in martyr because they are of sacrifice.  In that way of living any and such expense would not be considered sacrificial, and therefore of no pharmaceutical abide.

To make a practice of "immolation" illegal, any governed entity must review their own statutes with regard to verdict determination; as such a decision inadvertently leads to the martyred being of an individual. If a system chooses in myriad of extreme to allow consequences of the "being" to exist, then it is that system which allows the damaged and destruction to the martyr.  If the "cured" or "survivor" of being in martyr  in an "action" of incident has humanly replicated a "being"afterwards of persecution; such an instance can be feared in that now that individual as a survivor and belief now questions the authority and power it has given to those in pursuit of martyr for pharmaceutical and obide of statute.

To what extreme of belief in proportion must a person endure replication of person in persecution until any legal or biblical statute considers it unethical and most of all unnatural for persons to continue this way?

Such control by legal remedy must reprimand those directly who involve in the unlawful than to seek its martyr for sacrifical demand. And, if pharmaceutical curse; a remedy in cure has yet to be established people may have to forego actions that result in illness.

In : LAW 



null

Angel by Design?

Posted by Sheri Harris on Saturday, May 2, 2009 Under: LAW
What are the forces behind many who believe by extreme?  People in varied culture unite and attempt to gather as citizens of all. When the "pharmaceutical" is in demand and no cure becomes of immediate supply; the world loses all composition of reinforcement. Therefore, how do we tolerate, survive and live beyond a destined sentence that will affect us all?

Should we ask, is the martyr born of a person or thrust upon to aid in sacrifice resulting from lack of pharmaceutical cure? To "immolate" would be to sacrifice in that there would be no solvent of an answer to an otherwise predictable situation as in death. This can be used as a reason as to why there are those that resort to such infliction because of disparate treatment one will endure before and after demise of persons seeking a cure in ill measure of approach.

It is often the sheep in off color, that is used to fend for self as the others are herded in guidance. This existence in life towards a sect of people results in a martyred trait among person. The interest of money and all it can buy is there, but highly irrelevant to the role in martyr because they are of sacrifice.  In that way of living any and such expense would not be considered sacrificial, and therefore of no pharmaceutical abide.

To make a practice of "immolation" illegal, any governed entity must review their own statutes with regard to verdict determination; as such a decision inadvertently leads to the martyred being of an individual. If a system chooses in myriad of extreme to allow consequences of the "being" to exist, then it is that system which allows the damaged and destruction to the martyr.  If the "cured" or "survivor" of being in martyr  in an "action" of incident has humanly replicated a "being"afterwards of persecution; such an instance can be feared in that now that individual as a survivor and belief now questions the authority and power it has given to those in pursuit of martyr for pharmaceutical and obide of statute.

To what extreme of belief in proportion must a person endure replication of person in persecution until any legal or biblical statute considers it unethical and most of all unnatural for persons to continue this way?

Such control by legal remedy must reprimand those directly who involve in the unlawful than to seek its martyr for sacrifical demand. And, if pharmaceutical curse; a remedy in cure has yet to be established people may have to forego actions that result in illness.

In : LAW 



null

Angel by Design?

Posted by Sheri Harris on Saturday, May 2, 2009 Under: LAW
What are the forces behind many who believe by extreme?  People in varied culture unite and attempt to gather as citizens of all. When the "pharmaceutical" is in demand and no cure becomes of immediate supply; the world loses all composition of reinforcement. Therefore, how do we tolerate, survive and live beyond a destined sentence that will affect us all?

Should we ask, is the martyr born of a person or thrust upon to aid in sacrifice resulting from lack of pharmaceutical cure? To "immolate" would be to sacrifice in that there would be no solvent of an answer to an otherwise predictable situation as in death. This can be used as a reason as to why there are those that resort to such infliction because of disparate treatment one will endure before and after demise of persons seeking a cure in ill measure of approach.

It is often the sheep in off color, that is used to fend for self as the others are herded in guidance. This existence in life towards a sect of people results in a martyred trait among person. The interest of money and all it can buy is there, but highly irrelevant to the role in martyr because they are of sacrifice.  In that way of living any and such expense would not be considered sacrificial, and therefore of no pharmaceutical abide.

To make a practice of "immolation" illegal, any governed entity must review their own statutes with regard to verdict determination; as such a decision inadvertently leads to the martyred being of an individual. If a system chooses in myriad of extreme to allow consequences of the "being" to exist, then it is that system which allows the damaged and destruction to the martyr.  If the "cured" or "survivor" of being in martyr  in an "action" of incident has humanly replicated a "being"afterwards of persecution; such an instance can be feared in that now that individual as a survivor and belief now questions the authority and power it has given to those in pursuit of martyr for pharmaceutical and obide of statute.

To what extreme of belief in proportion must a person endure replication of person in persecution until any legal or biblical statute considers it unethical and most of all unnatural for persons to continue this way?

Such control by legal remedy must reprimand those directly who involve in the unlawful than to seek its martyr for sacrifical demand. And, if pharmaceutical curse; a remedy in cure has yet to be established people may have to forego actions that result in illness.

In : LAW 



null